Additional Information
Market:ASX 200
Sector:Investments and Funds
EPIC:XJO
1 year chart
digital-look imported chart image
1 day chart
digital-look imported chart image
Australia Market Wrap

A summary of all the major stories on the Australian Stock Exchange

Diamonds once glamorous, forgotten

Friday, January 29, 2010 by Barry Sergeant, Mineweb.com
Diamonds once glamorous, forgotten

Whatever happened to Bonaparte Diamonds, Nordic Diamonds, Cons Global Diamonds, Motapa Diamonds, and what seems to be happening to Archangel Diamonds, and what's going down at Snowfield?

These are some of the names in the world's seemingly forgotten mining sector that have quietly disappeared or changed direction or even survived in some lucky way since mid-2008, when commodity prices of all kinds went into a swoon as Wall Street continued its flip.

Most commodity prices spent most of 2009 recovering; dollar gold bullion made fresh record highs in December 2009. For some months now, diamond companies of all kinds have been sending out the message that rough gem prices are doing all right; given the base, it's hardly surprising. Gem Diamonds says that prices for rough diamonds from the Letšeng Mine, in Lesotho, have "risen from an average of USD 1,017 per carat in Q1 2009 to USD 2,070 per carat in December 2009".

De Beers, the world's biggest miner of rough diamonds, owned be 45% by Anglo American, 40% by the Oppenheimer family, and 15% by the Botswana government, has been a private company for some years; as such, its market value as a company is a matter of conjecture. The aggregate value of listed diamond miners around the world is about USD 3.2bn, ranking the subsector as one of the smallest among well known mining products.

The terrible beating that diamond diggers have taken in the past 18 months seems to have taken even the best-informed by surprise. De Beers is busy negotiating around USD 1bn in fresh equity from its shareholders, in the wake of a financial nightmare. De Beers publishes limited financial data, but enough to show that in the 30 months to mid-2009, it generated negative free cash flow (operating cash flow less capital expenditure) in total of minus USD 864m.

There was significant capital expenditure, at USD 1.2bn in 2006 and USD 1.5bn in 2007, mainly dedicated to building new mines in Canada. Over the 30 months, while free cash flow was negative to the tune of USD 864m, De Beers paid out an astonishing sum of USD 730m in cash dividends.

The group's swelling cash deficits have been funded by increased bank borrowings (during 2006 and 2007), and advances from shareholders, at USD 248m in 2008, and USD 500m in 2009. Net debt, including cash, stood at negative USD 3.3bn on 30 June 2009. De Beers has lots of financial repair ahead of it, but at least the mood has been lifted somewhat by improving rough diamond prices.

Bombed out diamond stocks with signs of life have been picked up by investors for six months or more. For some, this bargain hunting has bought hefty rewards; Kopane Diamonds, with interests in Lesotho, and a market value of USD 52m, has seen an eight-fold expansion in its stock price. But lots of investors continue to lick big wounds. Gem Diamonds, which listed in London in 2006, has at its helm Clifford Elphick, who previously worked for a good number of years at E. Oppenheimer & Son.

To date, Gem Diamonds has raised USD 811m from investors, most of it in 2007. The company spent USD 119m buying 70% of the Letšeng Mine, and a terrific USD 250m buying the Ellendale operations in Australia. Yet from its listing in 2006 until mid-2009, Gem Diamonds has produced negative free cash flow of USD 138m.


www.mineweb.com

 

No investment advice

The Company is a publisher and is not registered with or authorised by the Financial Services Authority (FSA). You understand and agree that no content published on the Site constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable or advisable for any specific person. You further understand that none of the information providers or their affiliates will advise you personally concerning the nature, potential, advisability, value or suitability of any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, investment strategy, or other matter.

You understand that the Site may contain opinions from time to time with regard to securities mentioned in other products, including company related products, and that those opinions may be different from those obtained by using another product related to the Company. You understand and agree that contributors may write about securities in which they or their firms have a position, and that they may trade such securities for their own account. In cases where the position is held at the time of publication and such position is known to the Company, appropriate disclosure is made. However, you understand and agree that at the time of any transaction that you make, one or more contributors may have a position in the securities written about. You understand that price and other data is supplied by sources believed to be reliable, that the calculations herein are made using such data, and that neither such data nor such calculations are guaranteed by these sources, the Company, the information providers or any other person or entity, and may not be complete or accurate.

From time to time, reference may be made in our marketing materials to prior articles and opinions we have published. These references may be selective, may reference only a portion of an article or recommendation, and are likely not to be current. As markets change continuously, previously published information and data may not be current and should not be relied upon.